Why Simple Tools Beat Complex Ones (An Amazon Case Study)
When Amazon changed course mid-stream, my "too simple" tool became the perfect solution
When Amazon changed course mid-stream, my "too simple" tool became the perfect solution
Amazon announced their variation theme removal on August 20th. Sellers had roughly 12 days to audit and fix their listings before the September 2nd deadline. For some catalogs, that meant 1-2 days of work. For larger ones? Maybe 10-20 days depending on catalog size.
Not to mention the stress of potentially changing 80% of your catalog.
Then Amazon walked it back. Six days later, on August 26th, they provided clarification that significantly reduced the scope.
Here's what happened behind the scenes with the tool I built, and why "too simple" turned out to be perfect.
The 30-Minute Build (That Almost Failed)
When the original announcement hit, I immediately started building a scanning tool in Claude. You can see the full breakdown here.
I spent about 30 minutes trying to get the Variation Theme Name (VTN) column to automatically align with different Category Listing Reports (CLRs). I was going deep, trying to account for every possible column configuration across different categories.
I was overcomplicating it.
I stepped back and said "I need to simplify this." So I did. I built a tool so simple that you had to tell it which column contained the VTN data. This changed with each CLR I downloaded for different clients, but the tool didn't care.
At the time, I thought this was a limitation. Turns out, it was the feature that saved everything.
When Amazon Changed Course
Six days after their original announcement, Amazon provided this clarification:
"Instead of removing all deprecated variation themes, we're now only removing themes with zero sales in the past 12 months. Critical themes like size, color, and style will remain available, and existing variation families will continue operating normally with no sales disruption."
Suddenly, other tools that had hardcoded the original deprecated list were wrong. They'd need backend updates, developer time, and potentially would never get fixed.
My "too simple" tool? I updated the reference sheet in 10 minutes. Same interface, new parameters, view the update.
Simple Made It Fluid
The tool's simplicity became its superpower. Because it didn't make assumptions about column positions or hardcode specific deprecated themes, it adapted instantly to Amazon's revision.
Other tools started popping up during this period, which is great - my LinkedIn reach is limited and I want sellers to have access to time-saving tools. But most weren't built for fluidity. They were built for the specific problem as originally announced.
This experience crystallized something for me: when you're building for Amazon, tools need to be fluid because Amazon changes things constantly.
The Education Problem
I've tried creating comprehensive educational content around Amazon many times. So have others. It's nearly impossible because the platform evolves too quickly for static content.
By the time you document a process, Amazon's changed the interface, updated the policy, or modified the requirements. Educational content becomes outdated faster than you can update it.
But tools? Tools can evolve.
What's Next
This whole experience made me realize I want to create a paid tier for these evolving tools. Since Amazon changes so much, the tools I build will need to evolve, and how you use them will evolve too.
Here's what I'm thinking:
Free subscribers: Monthly AI Field Notes (what you're reading now, this is a bonus post)
Paid subscribers get:
Subscriber-only posts with detailed AI workflows
First access to tools I build out
Post comments + community access
Chat support for tool usage
Full archives access
Tax write-off as business software with support
Founding members get everything above plus:
I'll help you build a customized tool for your specific workflow
Sounds fun, right?
The variation theme tool taught me that simplicity beats sophistication when you're dealing with a platform that changes weekly. I'm applying that lesson to everything I build going forward.
Questions about the tool or interested in the paid tier? Just reply to this email.
SaaS softwares are different in the space, most of them rely on on sp-api and so the changes in SPI are baked in with changes in api pulls. Narrowed into tools that are built out with AI or prompts for Chats, those need to be fluid for the changes that occur.
I'm currently building a software that utilizes SP-API and i'm taking simplicity to heart.